Why Qanon is baseless
3 years on since Q first started posting, you would expect his adherents to start seeing it is baseless. None of the major predictions have come to fruition. Instead Q is gaining new followers.
There is such a thing as Q proofs, which are predictions. Q’s followers routinely tweet out historical posts one year to the day and call them 1 year deltas, or 55 day deltas, as if they have current meaning.
The only one that seems to be accurate was to tie together Harvey Weinstein with his prison sentence announcement, 1 year and 1 day later. Q himself stated it was a “Q proof”, and asked, “who would be the next major name to fall?” As if such a thing could be accurately predicted, instead it was a fluke.
You’d think Jeffrey Epstein would have been watched more closely given the significance and the number of Q posts about him. If Q is military intelligence, and if Trump is in with Q, he is rather blase about Epstein’s crimes. He defended Acosta (https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/12/us/politics/acosta-resigns-trump.html) , stating it was “a prosecution which took place under his watch more than 12 years ago.” Acosta at the time had down played the Epstein case as being anything major, and prosecuted him on lesser charges.
If Q’s followers are going astray, Q is not managing their expectations over child trafficking. There are not 500,000 children (https://uk.reuters.com/article/us-wisconsin-missinggirl-data/kidnapped-children-make-headlines-but-abduction-is-rare-in-u-s-idUSKCN1P52BJ) that go missing each year in the United States. That number would swamp the number of alleged elite abusers. 99.8% are found alive, and only a few are rare kidnappings. Instead 95% are runaways, though this does show the children are wanting to get away from some type of situation.
Trump has stored away 180,000 sealed indictments. This suggests justice is currently not being met. However sealing can be because the defendants are juveniles, or because they are search warrants. Qanon is wrongly counting these are criminal indictments. “A random sampling of these files showed 83 percent of sealed magistrate cases to be warrant applications or tracking devices. They are NOT indictments.” https://www.dailydot.com/debug/sealed-indictments-qanon-conspiracy/
So what of Hillary Clinton and her charity? They have been investigated, and found no wrong doing. This article, (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-us-2016-37826098) states most of the cash went to “UN agencies, international aid groups, private contractors and donor countries’ own civilian and military agencies.”
This would be a similar situation to the rebuilding of Iraq after the war. The oil money was taken for redevelopment, a bit like having an open cheque book, and is symptomatic of American hegemony.
Q mentions it is saving Israel for last. Assuming this is to do with the 9/11 conspiracy theory, that Mossad was involved. Do you really think that someone making a Middle East peace doesn’t know the facts, and is going to go back on their word, if there was some involvement? Surely there’s a proper order and if there’s a sealed indictment that should be opened before a deal? This tells me they have no concrete evidence.
Knowing paedophiles have been arrested is justice for the victims, but only a newspaper story for the public. If it is a great awakening you’d expect it to encompass far more relevant topics. For instance usury, reforming the justice system, stopping monopolies like Amazon and google, stopping the police state and 24 hour surveillance. But there’s none of this. Just a lone tweet of Trump walking up the aeroplane steps with his wallet in his back pocket, and wearing a gold tie, to which someone tweeted it signified a return to the gold standard.
But maybe the conspiracies are all true. If the media are all in on the scam (which implies they know whats in these sealed indictments — which is impossible because they’re sealed), there will not be a point in the future where there are mass sackings. There will only be a change of stories to report. The news is subjective, and the slant is taken from the owners political viewpoint. Only if the MSM go bust will these journalists be flushed out of the system.
Q has said “this isn’t another 4 year cycle”, this is Q’s way of giving misinformation. However he didn’t give hope, he gave a specifically timed promise. It will be interesting to see how Q’s adherents deal with that.
